SOURCES
In this week's blog assignment I was given the power of being in charge of the United States. And although it is a big responsibility, my first duty as being the leader is coming up with an energy policy for the country. This means I have to choose three main sources of energy. The three that I chose are wind, solar, and biofuels. There are advantages and disadvantages to each of these, just like there are for all of the energy sources. For wind, one of the main pros is that it does not cause pollution. However, some people argue that they cause a sort of "sight pollution," and they may ruin the beauty of natural landscapes. Also, wind is a renewable resource so that is another pro that would result in using wind energy. Solar energy is also another renewable form of energy. There is also a wide availability for use of solar energy; it can be used in all parts of the world. One of the biggest cons is that solar energy can be rather expensive. Lastly, biofuel is another renewable form of energy, and it is also more cost effective. According to the energy informative website, biofuel usually costs "about 1/3 less than fossil fuels doing the sam job." For the cons, there is sometimes a lot of spaces needed in order to go through all the processes necessary to create the energy.
I also have to address energy policy in this blog. How will make sure that the citizens of the U.S. are making changes in order to be more efficient? One way that I can promote energy efficiency is to provide all public areas (schools, community centers) with solar panels and encourage others to do the same on their own homes. Another way would be to encourage citizens to take shorter showers, and cooler showers, and turn lights off in rooms that nobody is in. Lastly, I will encourage everyone to bike as much as possible, especially places that are a mile or less away. I will do all of this by creating commercials, radio announcements, newspaper articles, etc. that encourage citizens to do these things.
Making the switch to renewable energy sources will have economic disadvantages, but it will also have benefits. Building wind turbines, installing solar panels, and creating more space for biofuel will, no doubt, cost a lot of money, possible negatively impacting the environment. However, once these things are built, they will be there for good, unlike fossil fuels, which require continuous drilling for oil, so this can be seen as a positive impact because it will save more money in the long run. Another negative impact on the economy would be that a lot more jobs would have to be created in order to help keep the renewable energy industry running, however, this can also impact the economy positively, after awhile when these industries start to bring more money back.
Finally, I had to figure out how I would make all of this work. It definitely wouldn't be easy and it might even be something that takes years to accomplish. But, I think the key is to start with educating people, especially the youth. When I was in high school, there was one environmental science class, and it was AP, so a lot of students were turned off by that. I think environmental science should be something that is taught, as its very own course, in as early as 6th grade. Policies and laws will also be important; it may seem extreme, but I would like to make it a law that every home has solar panels installed, starting with certain areas, and working our way throughout the country. These solar panels will have to be paid for of course, so I plan on keeping corrupt companies like fossil fuel companies from getting subsidized, and bringing those subsidies to the companies who are going to work toward promoting renewable energy. According to the IMF "Fossil fuels are being subsidized by a million dollars per minute." We clearly have the money to support renewable energy, it is just being spent on the wrong things.
Sources:
http://energyinformative.org/biomass-energy-pros-and-cons/
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/may/18/fossil-fuel-companies-getting-10m-a-minute-in-subsidies-says-imf




